The server wiki is a collaborative platform and everyone is encouraged to contribute to its development.
Principles
The operation of the wiki will be guided by the Network rules and the following principles:
- Collaboration. The wiki is maintained by the community, with all contributors encouraged to improve and expand its content. Contributors should discuss significant or contentious changes, assume good faith, and work towards consensus as stewards of our server's knowledge base.
- Accuracy. Content must be factual, reliable, and neutral.
- Consistent. Content must follow standards, formatting, and style guidelines.
Administrative Changes
Any changes to the rules and standards of the server wiki will be consulted and approved by major stakeholders before being actioned. Namely, Network Staff, the Department of Education, and where appropriate, the player base.
Routine edits, corrections, and content improvements may be made by any contributor.
Routine Management
The Department of Education, on behalf of the Government, acts as the first-among-equals in the day-to-day management of the wiki. It is responsible for coordinating improvements, maintaining standards, resolving editorial disputes, and supporting contributors.
Content Moderation
All content is subject to the Network Rules. Network Staff may remove or revert content that violates those rules and should notify the Department of Education of any such action.
Content that does not align with this wiki's principles may be reverted or amended by any contributor. Contributors should provide an edit summary or other notation explaining the reason for the change.
Quality Assurance
Pages that do not meet the quality standards expected by the wiki should be appropriately amended to ensure that readers are provided with factual and well-supported information. Claims that lack reliable citations or do not have a solid foundation should be marked for review using the appropriate annotation in the form of {{cn|date=...}}.
Inflammatory or opinionated language should be removed and replaced with neutral wording. In particular, claims that are disputed or unclear should be phrased using balanced journalistic language that does not favor any viewpoint. If these claims are also presented without appropriate citations, they should also receive a citation-needed annotation.
If editors cannot reach a consensus or opinions vary on a specific page, a discussion thread should be opened up in the article's discussion page. The discussion page should be used to avoid disagreements playing out with editors repeatedly reverting or overwriting each other's changes.
'''''