Toggle menu
309
640
1
6.7K
DemocracyCraft Wiki
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.
Revision as of 17:30, 31 July 2025 by RylandW (talk | contribs) (Tense)
File:Revalen logo.png
Former nameRevSearch
General information
StatusOnline
OwnerThe Reveille Times
URLrevalen.trvtimes.com
Developerlukadelrey
LaunchedJune 2025

Revalen (initially RevSearch) is a search engine designed specifically for DemocracyCraft. It was founded and developed by lukadelrey and is a project of The Reveille Times. Revalen uses artificial intelligence and basic search engine technology to pull from the DemocracyCraft Wiki, acts of Congress, The Reveille Times, Paper News, The Exchange, etc. to present results and create an infobox for entities.

Revalen also supports live access of stock data and maps. Integration of /find has been requested.[1]

Integrations and sources

An infobox displaying information about Dearev (July 2025).

Revalen pulls from the DemocracyCraft Wiki to create its infoboxes and as search results. It also pulls from the websites of The Reveille Times and Paper News as search results. When displaying stock data, including the ticker symbol, total price, price change, stock exchange, outstanding shares, and status; it also includes a ranking of top stockholders at the bottom of the infobox showing information about the company pulled from The Exchange.

Privacy and preferences

Upon visiting the search engine's webpage, users see a pop-up asking if they want their results to include artificial intelligence-enhanced content, personalised results, and personalised ads. Users can toggle each on or off.[2]

Success

In July 2025, xEndeavour created a poll in #server-announcements asking if players wanted Revalen to be linked in the forums navigation bar. Ninety-seven respondents answered yes, while seven responded "Maybe Not".[3] Revalen was subsequently linked. This was met with minor backlash, such as by Dearev, who opined that Revalen, "just like any other company shouldn't have the shortcut", and should instead by linked in #links, "which would be fair".[4]

References